 |
Legible Typography: Some Dos and Donts
| |
Selecting a typeface to be used in a publication,
visual display, or signage is not an arbitrary, let-the-designer-do-it
proposition. Type is meant to be read effectively and to convey information
pleasingly. That means that type selection should be based upon legibility
if it is to be read, understood, and acted upon. Decisions about type
selection certainly should be based upon artistic taste, but only
after the type answers a much more basic question: Can the message
be easily read by the specific audience for which it is intended?
|
Type sizes for text
| |
Do use 9-, 10-, 11-, or 12-point type for optimum legibility in
printed text.
Do use 11- or 12-point type if the typeface you prefer has a small
x-height (small lowercase letters).
DONT use 6- or 7-point type for regular reading material. If
you must use 8- and 14-point type, use them sparingly as these faces
slow reading speed significantly.
|
Which face to useserif or sans serif?
| |
Do use a serif typeface for text matter, as style choices and size
permit. Readers generally prefer serif styles, such as Times Roman,
Garamond, Goudy, etc.
Do use a sans serif typeface, such as Helvetica, for headlines,
visual presentations, and signage or for text matter if it fits
the tone or mood of the message.
Do use a typeface, whether serif or sans serif, that has a medium
body weightnot light or boldwhen selecting type for
text matter.
DONT worry about serif vs. sans serif for reading speedthe
difference is insignificant.
DONT pick typefaces for text matter or headlines if they fall
into the following categories: script or calligraphic styles (Old
English, Cloister Black, Wedding Text, etc.); hand lettered (Brush,
Dom Casual, etc.); and cutesy-pie type styles (Cueball, Hobo,
etc.).
|
Italic vs. Roman vs. bold
| |
Do use Roman type of medium body weight (Helvetica Regular, Times
Roman, Palatino, etc.) for text.
Do use bold type for emphasisbut sparingly. Bold type often
works best for visual presentations (slides, videos, etc.) and for
signage.
DONT use italic type if at all possible; readers dislike it strongly
because it is hard to read.
DONT use bold type for long sections of text matter; it tires
the eye.
DONT use extremely light type (Helvetica Light, Avant Garde Light,
etc.). It does not contrast sufficiently with the background.
|
Line width
| |
Do try to gauge line length by the number of words per line, or
by the number of characters and spaces per line10 to 12 words
per line, or between 35 to 55 characters and spaces per line.
Do use narrower line widths for small type, i.e., use 12- or 14-pica
(2- to 2.5-inch) lines for 7- to 8-point type.
Do use moderate line widths for 9- to 12-point type, ranging in
width from 18- to 24-pica (3- to 4-inch) lines.
DONT use very narrow line widths (1 to 11 picas) for any size
of type.
DONT use very wide line widths (more than 25 picas or more than
55 characters per line).
|
Leading (line spacing)
| |
Do lead (line space) between lines of 9 to 12 point type, using
either 1-, 2-, 3-, or 4-point leading. (The amount of leading used
is a matter of personal taste.)
Do use more leading for heavier typefaces and for longer line
widths.
DONT set type solid (no leading); readers dislike solid text
matter and read it more slowly.
|
Justified vs. flush left, ragged right
| |
Do choose which stylejustified or flush left, ragged rightyou
like best since all research says they are equally legible for normal
readers.
Do consider flush left, ragged right when children or slower-paced
readers are involved. They scan it better.
DONT set text type flush right, ragged left, or centered line
for line. Readers dislike it.
|
Uppercase vs. lowercase type
| |
Do set text matter in lowercase, using uppercase only for the first
letter in a sentence and for the first letter of proper nouns.
Do set headlines either up-style or down-style. (Up-style
capitalizes the first letter of nouns and verbs, and lowercases
prepositions and articles; down-style capitalizes only the first
letter of a headline and any proper nouns.) Both styles are equally
legible.
DONT set any text matter or long headlines in all capital letters.
The use of all caps significantly reduces reading speed and uses
25 to 35 percent more space, depending on the typeface.
|
Ink, paper colors, and type selection
| |
Do select ink and paper on the basis of maximum contrast between
the two. There should be a difference of at least 65% between the
density of the type and the color of the background on which it
is printed. (Black ink on white paper is most legible, followed
closely by black ink on yellow stock.) Many of these same principles
apply to visual presentations and signage.
DONT use darker paper colors for text material, and DONT print
darker background colors behind type.
DONT use light or medium ink colors for text matter.
DONT worry about which light-colored paper to use. Research indicates
that papers in such colors as yellow, ivory, light green, etc.,
have little effect on legibility or eye strain when black ink is
used.
|
Reverse type
| |
Do use reverse type for visual presentations (slides, videos, etc.)
and signage for improved legibility.
DONT use small type (9 point or less) in reverse form (white
on black background) for text. Use larger typefaces sparingly in
reverse. Readers show low preferences for text type in reverse,
and they read it more slowly.
|
Numbers
| |
Do set numbers as Arabic, rather than Roman, numerals, using Old
Style numerals when possible. (Old Style numerals have ascenders
and descenders that make them more legible and more readable than
Modern Numerals.)
DONT set numbers written out in word form. Numerals take less
space and are read faster than words.
|
Prepared by M. Fredric Volkmann
Vice Chancellor for Public Affairs
Washington University in St. Louis
(Derived from three
compendia of research into legibility: Bases for Effective Reading,
by Miles A. Tinker, University of Minnesota Press, 1966; Legibility
of Print, by Miles A. Tinker, Iowa State University Press, 1969; and
Typography: How to make it most legible, by Rolfe F. Rehe, Design
Research International, P.O. Box 27, Carmel, Indiana, 2nd revised edition,
1976.)
October 7, 1994
|